Occupied territory

Occupied territory is territory under military occupation. Occupation is a term of art in international law. At the end of a war, usually the victorious side is in possession of territory previously possessed by another state. This territory is known as occupied territory. Examples of occupied territory include Germany and Japan by the Allies in the aftermath of World War II; mainland China by the Communist Party of China split from the Republic of China after its 1949 loss of Chinese Civil War; Cambodia by Vietnam from 1979 until 1989; and Iraq by the United States and its allies after the 2003 invasion.

Contents

History

In accordance with Article 42 of the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Fourth Hague Convention); October 18, 1907,[1] territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised. Acquisition of occupied territory is incidental to a war, where the military forces of the occupying power come into the possession of territory previously held by another state. Occupation is usually temporary; and under the subsequent articles of the Hague convention (articles 43, 44, etc.), and the Fourth Geneva Convention the status quo must be maintained pending the signing of a peace treaty, the resolution of specific conditions outlined in a peace treaty, or the formation of a new civilian government.[2]

During World War II, the use of annexation deprived whole populations of the safeguards provided by international laws governing military occupations. Changes were introduced to international law through the Fourth Geneva Convention that makes it much more difficult for a state to bypass international law through the use of annexation.[2] GCIV Article 47, the first paragraph in Section III: Occupied territories, restricted the territorial gains which could be made through war,[2] and Article 49 prohibits mass movement of people out of or into occupied territory.[3] If a state unilaterally declares a territory that has been under military occupation to be annexed, bodies such as the United Nations Security Council frequently describe such territory as "occupied" when that annexation is in breach of international law or not accepted by the United Nations General Assembly, even if the territory is governed through the civil rather than military laws of the state that has integrated the occupied territory into their own territory.[4][5][6][7]

Occupied territories since 1907

For a list of occupied territories since the Hague Convention of 1907 Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907 first clarified and supplemented the customary laws of belligerent military occupation see the list of military occupations and the list of territorial disputes.

Jammu and Kashmir

The Himalayan Kashmir region is a disputed and occupied territory since 1947, claimed by India as part of its country, while both the Peoples' Republic of China and Pakistan, dispute India's claims and Pakistan claims most of Kashmir as their territory. The former Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir is currently divided between India, Pakistan and Peoples' Republic of China. Kashmir under Indian illegal military occupation is called as Maqboza Kashmir or Occupied Kashmir where as Kashmiri areas under Pakistani administration is called P.A.K.[8] and Northern Areas[9][10] by India, and Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan[9][10][11] by Pakistan, Chinese administered Kashmiri regions are called Aksai Chin,[12] Trans-Karakoram Tract[11] and Demchok by India while Peoples' Republic of China administer it as parts of Kashgar Prefecture[11] and Hotan Prefecture of Xinjiang,[11][12] and Dêmqog of Tibet Autonomous Region.[12] The United Nations[13] and other local entities use the designation Jammu and Kashmir to geographically denote said area.

Greater China

The contemporary country now known internationally as "China" (PRC) was considered by the government of the Republic of China (ROC, now commonly known as "Taiwan") as territory occupied by the People's Liberation Army of the Chinese communists in the Chinese Civil War since 1949, when the ROC government fled to Taiwan and originally aimed to reclaim its mainland territory. This territory was referred to in the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion passed in 1948 as "Communist occupied mainland China", and the same term mainland China was used in the subsequent amendments to the ROC's constitution since mainland China is officially still considered an area of its "China" (id est "Republic of China").[14][15] Taiwan and other ROC-controlled areas were referred to as "Free area of the Republic of China". Although the ROC government stopped making active claim on the mainland after the end of martial law in Taiwan in 1987, the official end of treating mainland China as occupied territory during the "period of Communist Rebellion" did not come into effect until April 22, 1991, when the Temporary Provisions was abolished and the "period of Communist Rebellion" was declared terminated on May 1.[16]

Conversely, China's Communist government also considers Taiwan its "unliberated" territory occupied by an enemy force (ROC) and claims it as a province, and still aims to "liberate" it, by military force if necessary, formalized by its 2005 Anti-Secession Law.[17][18]

Taiwan was an occupied territory taken from Japan by the Allied Powers following the defeat of Japan in World War II in 1945. The U.S. occupied it first and then transferred the occupation duties to the ROC under General Order No. 1 on August 17, 1945 as a temporary trustee to receive the surrender of Japanese troops and transfer of property. Due to the lack of a specified country assigned to receive the sovereignty of Taiwan under the Treaty of Peace with Japan in 1951, the continued presence and rule of Taiwan by the ROC is considered by some legal scholars and Taiwan Independence supporters to be illegitimate and that Taiwan is still an occupied territory whose sovereignty is yet undetermined. (See Legal status of Taiwan.)

Israeli-occupied territories

After the Six-day War in 1967, the Israel Defence Forces took control of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. The situation in these territories has been described by almost the entire international community as occupation.[19]

West Bank & Gaza Strip

The presence and establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and formerly, in the Gaza Strip, and the construction of a barrier dividing parts of the territory are major bones of contention in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) 2004 Advisory Opinion on the 'Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory' ruled that all the territories occupied by the Israeli Defense Forces in 1967, '(including East Jerusalem), remain occupied territories and Israel has continued to have the status of occupying Power'. The Palestine Liberation Organization has repeatedly called on the international community to enforce ICJ's rulings on the West Bank.[20]

Whether or not Israel still occupies the Gaza Strip following its 2005 unilateral disengagement from there is disputed.[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Paul S. Riebenfeld, an international lawyer, who represented Jewish interests at the League of Nations, argued that the West Bank and the Gaza Strip do not belong to any other sovereign state, are part of former Mandate Palestine, and therefore fall legitimately within Israel's jurisdiction.

Golan Heights

The United Nations,[30] the United States,[31] the European Union,[32] the United Kingdom,[33] the Arab League,[34] the International Committee of the Red Cross,[35] Amnesty International,[36] and Human Rights Watch[37] consider the Golan Heights to be Syrian territory occupied by Israel.

Western Sahara

Western Sahara is considered an occupied territory by the POLISARIO (Sahrawi national liberation movement), the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) (government in exile in Algeria), the United Nations,[38] the African Union and some other countries and human rights groups. International bodies[39][40] and some other states as a policy of deliberate ambiguity see Morocco as the de facto administrative power pending a solution to the conflict.[39][40] The referendum that the UN wants to hold has been effectively blocked, and many of the incidents reported to have occurred in the territory[41] are consistent with an unaccountable military occupation.

Most of the territory claimed by the SADR in Western Sahara is currently under the unrecognized but effective sovereignty of Morocco. They do not recognize the SADR, though dozens of countries do.[42]

Cyprus

The northern part of the Mediterranean island of Cyprus has been occupied by the Turkish military since 1974[43][44][45] and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus which has declared independence on the island has not been recognized except by Turkey.[46][47][48][49] The Turkish invasion caused a significant exodus of Greek Cypriots from the north, followed by a similar movement of Turkish Cypriots from the south. The Turkish government has initiated a policy of colonisation by settlers from various parts of Turkey,[50] leading to a demographic alteration of the occupied territories.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]

Abkhazia and South Ossetia

Following the 2008 South Ossetia war in early August 2008, Russia recognised Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states on 26 August 2008.[71] In response, on 28 August 2008, the Georgian parliament passed a non-binding resolution calling on the Georgian government to sever diplomatic relations with Russia, because of the recognition of what the Georgian parliament deemed to be occupied territories.[72] This culminated on 29 August 2008 with Georgia severing diplomatic relations with Russia.[73]

On 23 October 2008, Georgia endorsed "The Law on Occupied Territories" defining "the status of territories occupied as a result of the military aggression of the Russian Federation" and envisaging "a special legal regime" on these territories.[74] In March 2009, the Venice Commission, the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional and legal issues, asked by Georgia to opine on the law, said that the criminalisation of entry into the occupied territories without making explicit exceptions for emergency situations or humanitarian aid was a matter of concern.[75]

Nagorno-Karabakh

Some 30,000 people died in the Nagorno-Karabakh war,[77][78] which erupted after the mountainous region declared independence in 1991.[79][80][81][82] Nagorno-Karabakh has been under Armenian control[83] since a Russian-brokered ceasefire in 1994.[84][85] Additional to this, Armenians occupy seven other Azerbaijani districts. This resulted in the displacement of 528,000 Azerbaijanis.[86] The UN Security Council has passed four resolutions on the "Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan" in 1993. The UN General Assembly[87] and other international organizations have similarly passed several resolutions recognizing Azerbaijan's territorial integrity and sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh, urging withdrawal of all occupying forces and peaceful resolution. The peace mediation is taken up by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group since 1992.[88]

Kosovo

Occupied since 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia, Kosovo is a province inside Serbia which self-proclaimed secession of the de-facto annexed territories in 2008. This is in violation of the UN resolution 1244, which placed Kosovo under KFOR and NATO occupation, while admitting Serbian sovereignty. Nevertheless, some 80 countries have recognized the secession, led by NATO countries that waged the war against Serbia. The secession does not have the support of UN General Assembly, nor the UN Security Council, in which permanent members (also NATO members that illegally bombed Serbia) United States, Great Britain and France lobby for secession, while non-NATO permanent members China and Russia vehemently oppose this violation of international law.

See also

References

  1. ^ 'Hague IV, MILITARY AUTHORITY OVER THE TERRITORY OF THE HOSTILE STATE, Article 42'
  2. ^ a b c Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.Commentary on Part III : Status and treatment of protected persons #Section III : Occupied territories Art. 47 by the ICRC
  3. ^ Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.Commentary on Part III : Status and treatment of protected persons #Section III : Occupied territories Art. 49 by the ICRC
  4. ^ John Dugard (professor of international law at the University of Leiden) An illegal annexation : Tear down Israel's wall International Herald Tribune, 2 August 2003
  5. ^ John Dugard (The Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights for the occupied Palestinian territory) Israel uses excessive force and annexation in Palestinian territories – UN report, UN News Centre. Accessed 11 July 2008.
  6. ^ Paul Lewis, Confrontation in the Gulf; U.N. Council Declares Void Iraqi Annexation of Kuwait, The New York Times, 10 August 1990
  7. ^ R. W. Apple Jr. After the war: The Overview; Iraq Disavows annexation, pledging to repay Kuwait; Rebellion my be subsiding, The New York Times, 6 March 1991
  8. ^ PoK students want seats in IIM/IITsRediff.com, 2006-05-23
  9. ^ a b "15451". Meaindia.nic.in. 2010-01-01. http://meaindia.nic.in/pressrelease/2010/01/01pr02.htm. Retrieved 2010-06-05. 
  10. ^ a b "India gets European Parliament support - New Europe". Neurope.eu. 2007-06-01. http://www.neurope.eu/articles/India-gets-European-Parliament-support/74455.php. Retrieved 2010-06-05. 
  11. ^ a b c d Woodman (1969) pp.307-309
  12. ^ a b c "Aksai Chin: China's disputed slice of Kashmir". CNN.com. 24 May 2002. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/24/aksai.chin/. Retrieved 2007-07-23. 
  13. ^ http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unmogip/
  14. ^ "Temporary Provisions Effective during the Period of the Communist Rebellion (1948)". Taiwan Documents Project. http://www.taiwandocuments.org/constitution07.htm. Retrieved 23 December 2011. 
  15. ^ "Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (2005 Reform)". Wikisource. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Additional_Articles_of_the_Constitution_of_the_Republic_of_China_(2005_Reform). Retrieved 23 December 2011. 
  16. ^ {{Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion Wikipedia
  17. ^ Anti-Secession Law, Wikipedia.
  18. ^ "China says use of force against Taiwan is 'last case scenario'". The Parliament Magazine. http://www.theparliament.com/latest-news/article/newsarticle/china-will-continue-to-use-threat-of-force-against-taiwan. Retrieved 23 December 2011. 
  19. ^ "The Geneva Convention". BBC News. 10 December 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1682640.stm. Retrieved 27 November 2010. 
  20. ^ PLO calls for implementing the ICJ ruling against the Wall, International Middle East Media Center, December 9, 2009.
  21. ^ Dore Gold, JCPA Legal Acrobatics: The Palestinian Claim that Gaza is Still "Occupied" Even After Israel Withdraws, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Vol. 5, No. 3, August 26, 2005.
  22. ^ International Law and Gaza: The Assault on Israel's Right to Self-Defense, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 29 28 January 2008.
  23. ^ Israeli MFA Address by Israeli Foreign Minister Livni to the 8th Herzliya Conference, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Israel), January 22, 2008.
  24. ^ Panelists Disagree Over Gaza’s Occupation Status, University of Virginia School of Law, November 17, 2005.
  25. ^ "Israel: 'Disengagement' Will Not End Gaza Occupation" Human Rights Watch. October 29, 2004
  26. ^ "Human Rights Council Special Session on the Occupied Palestinian Territories" July 6, 2006"
  27. ^ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs office on Occupied Palestinian Territory web site.
  28. ^ Summary of the Advisory Opinion: Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, International Court of Justice, July 9, 2004.
  29. ^ Richard Falk, Statement by Prof. Richard Falk, United Nations Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, United Nations Human Rights Council, December 27, 2008.
  30. ^ "Poverty, unemployment worsen in Israeli-occupied Arab territories". United Nations. 26 May 2006. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=18628&Cr=Palestin&Cr1=. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  31. ^ "CRS Issue Brief for Congress: Israeli-United States Relations". Congressional Research Service. April 5, 2002. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9570.pdf. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  32. ^ "Presidency Statement on Golan Heights". 04/01/2004. http://www.delsyr.ec.europa.eu/en/whatsnew_new/detail.asp?id=41. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  33. ^ "Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories". UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 11 June 2009. http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travelling-and-living-overseas/travel-advice-by-country/middle-east-north-africa/israel-occupied. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  34. ^ "The Arab Peace Initiative, 2002". Al-Bab. 2002. http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/peace02.htm. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  35. ^ "Occupied Golan: ICRC mitigates some effects of occupation". ICRC. 2010-03-02. http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/israel-golan-update-020310. Retrieved 2010-04-14. 
  36. ^ "ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY Without distinction - attacks on civilians by Palestinian armed groups". Amnesty International. 10 July 2002. http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE02/003/2002/en/ad408511-d821-11dd-9df8-936c90684588/mde020032002en.html. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  37. ^ "Promoting Impunity The Israeli Military’s Failure to Investigate Wrongdoing". HRW. June 2005. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/iopt0605/4.htm. Retrieved 2009-06-23. 
  38. ^ UN General Assembly Resolution 34/37 - November 21, 1979 and UN General Assembly Resolution 35/19 - November 11, 1980
  39. ^ a b Arabicnews.com (1998-12-17). "Arab League withdraws inaccurate Moroccan maps". Arabicnews.com. http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/981217/1998121758.html. Retrieved 2006-07-15. 
  40. ^ a b Arabicnews.com (1999-01-08). "Arab League supports Morocco's territorial integrity". Arabicnews.com. http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/990108/1999010849.html. Retrieved 2006-07-15. 
  41. ^ Western Sahara "Impunity for past crimes remained a serious concern, particularly since some alleged perpetrators continued to be members, or even high-ranking officials, of the security forces.". Verified 4 October 2007.
  42. ^ Third World Traveller Intifada in Western Sahara, Morocco seals off the occupied territory, New Internationalist magazine, August 2005. Verified 4 October 2007.
  43. ^ Antiwar.com. In Praise of 'Virtual States', Leon Hadar, November 16, 2005
  44. ^ Carter Johnson, University of Maryland. Sovereignty or Demography? Reconsidering the Evidence on Partition in Ethnic Civil Wars, 2005
  45. ^ Emerson, Michael (2004). The Wider Europe Matrix. CPSE. ISBN 9290794690. 
  46. ^ BBC: The status of Northern Cyprus as a separate entity is recognised only by Turkey, which keeps around 30,000 troops in the north of the island.
  47. ^ Europe Review, Kogan Page, 2003, p.79
  48. ^ Nurşin Ateşoğlu Güney, Contentious issues of security and the future of Turkey, Ashgate Publishing, 2007, p.161
  49. ^ The CIA World Factbook 2010, Central Intelligence Agency (U.S.), p.182
  50. ^ "Council of Europe Committee on Migration, Refugees and Demography". http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/doc03/EDOC9799.htm. 
  51. ^ Welz, Gisela. Divided Cyprus: Modernity, History, and an Island in Conflict. Indiana University Press. p. 2. ISBN 0253218519. 
  52. ^ Carpenter, Ted Galen (2000). NATO's Empty Victory: A Postmortem on the Balkan War. Washington, D.C: Cato Institute. p. 36. ISBN 1-882577-85-X. 
  53. ^ Carpenter, Ted Galen (2002). Peace and Freedom: Foreign Policy for a Constitutional Republic. Washington, D.C: Cato Institute. p. 187. ISBN 1-930865-34-1. 
  54. ^ Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos (2001). The Prevention of Human Rights Violations (International Studies in Human Rights). Berlin: Springer. p. 24. ISBN 90-411-1672-9. 
  55. ^ Borowiec, Andrew (2000). Cyprus: a troubled island. New York: Praeger. p. 2. ISBN 0-275-96533-3. 
  56. ^ Rezun, Miron (2001). Europe's nightmare: the struggle for Kosovo. New York: Praeger. p. 6. ISBN 0-275-97072-8. 
  57. ^ Brown, Neville (2004). Global instability and strategic defence. New York: Routledge. p. 48. ISBN 0-415-30413-X. 
  58. ^ Borowiec, Andrew (2000). Cyprus: a troubled island. New York: Praeger. pp. 2. ISBN 0-275-96533-3.
  59. ^ Brown, Neville (2004). Global instability and strategic defence. New York: Routledge. pp. 48. ISBN 0-415-30413-X.
  60. ^ Ted Galen Carpenter, Peace & freedom: foreign policy for a constitutional republic, Cato Institute, 2002, ISBN 1930865341, 9781930865341, p. 187
  61. ^ Ted Galen Carpenter, NATO's empty victory: a postmortem on the Balkan War, Cato Institute, 2000, ISBN 188257785X, 9781882577859
  62. ^ Jean S. Forward, Endangered peoples of Europe: struggles to survive and thrive The Greenwood Press "Endangered peoples of the world" series Endangered peoples of the world, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, 0313310068, 9780313310065, p. 53
  63. ^ Antony Evelyn Alcock, A history of the protection of regional cultural minorities in Europe: from the Edict of Nantes to the present day, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. ISBN 0312235569, 9780312235567, p. 207
  64. ^ Van Coufoudakis, Eugene T. Rossides, American Hellenic Institute Foundation, 2002, ISBN 1889247057, 9781889247052, p. 236
  65. ^ William Mallinson, Bill Mallinson, Cyprus: a modern history , I.B.Tauris, 2005, ISBN 1850435804, 9781850435808, p. 147
  66. ^ .Robert F. Holland, Britain and the revolt in Cyprus, 1954-1959, Oxford University Press, 1998, ISBN 0198205384, 9780198205388
  67. ^ University of Minnesota. Modern Greek Studies Program, Modern Greek studies yearbook, Τόμος 9, University of Minnesota, 1993, p.577
  68. ^ David J. Whittaker, Conflict and reconciliation in the contemporary world, Making of the contemporary world, Routledge, 1999, ISBN 0415183278, 9780415183277, p. 52
  69. ^ Miron Rezun, Europe's nightmare: the struggle for Kosovo, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, ISBN 0275970728, 9780275970727
  70. ^ Dimitris Keridis, Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, Kokkalis Foundation, NATO and southeastern Europe: security issues for the early 21st century A publication of the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis & the Kokkalis Foundation, Brassey's, 2000, ISBN 1574882899, 9781574882896, p.187
  71. ^ "Russia Formally Recognizes Abkhazia, S.Ossetia". Tbilisi: Civil Georgia. 26 August 2008. http://civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=19293. Retrieved 14 August 2010. 
  72. ^ "Abkhazia, S.Ossetia Formally Declared Occupied Territory". Tbilisi: Civil Georgia. 28 August 2008. http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=19330. Retrieved 14 August 2010. 
  73. ^ "Georgia Cuts Diplomatic Ties with Russia". Tbilisi: Civil Georgia. 29 August 2008. http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=19345&search=. Retrieved 14 August 2010. 
  74. ^ The law of Georgia On Occupied Territories. Venice Commission. 19 January 2009
  75. ^ Opinion on the Law on occupied territories of Georgia adopted by the Venice Commission. Venice Commission. 17 March 2009
  76. ^ CIA World Factbook 2002
  77. ^ a b De Waal, Thomas (2003). Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War. New York: New York University Press. pp. passim. ISBN 0-8147-1945-7. 
  78. ^ "Winds of Change in Nagorno Karabakh ." Euronews. November 28, 2009.
  79. ^ Human Rights Watch. Playing the "Communal Card". Communal Violence and Human Rights: "By early 1992 full-scale fighting broke out between Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and Azerbaijani authorities." / "...Karabakh Armenian forces—often with the support of forces from the Republic of Armenia—conducted large-scale operations..." / "Because 1993 witnessed unrelenting Karabakh Armenian offensives against the Azerbaijani provinces surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh..." / "Since late 1993, the conflict has also clearly become internationalized: in addition to Azerbaijani and Karabakh Armenian forces, troops from the Republic of Armenia participate on the Karabakh side in fighting inside Azerbaijan and in Nagorno-Karabakh."
  80. ^ Human Rights Watch. The former Soviet Union. Human Rights Developments: "In 1992 the conflict grew far more lethal as both sides—the Azerbaijani National Army and free-lance militias fighting along with it, and ethnic Armenians and mercenaries fighting in the Popular Liberation Army of Artsakh—began."
  81. ^ United States Institute of Peace. Nagorno-Karabakh Searching for a Solution. Foreword: "Nagorno-Karabakh’s armed forces have not only fortified their region, but have also occupied a large swath of surrounding Azeri territory in the hopes of linking the enclave to Armenia."
  82. ^ United States Institute of Peace. Sovereignty after Empire. Self-Determination Movements in the Former Soviet Union. Hopes and Disappointments: Case Studies "Meanwhile, the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh was gradually transforming into a full-scale war between Azeri and Karabakh irregulars, the latter receiving support from Armenia." / "Azerbaijan's objective advantage in terms of human and economic potential has so far been offset by the superior fighting skills and discipline of Nagorno-Karabakh's forces. After a series of offensives, retreats, and counteroffensives, Nagorno-Karabakh now controls a sizable portion of Azerbaijan proper ... including the Lachin corridor."
  83. ^ Svante E. Cornell. "The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict." Report No 46, Department of East European Studies, Uppsala University, 1999.
  84. ^ Croissant, Michael P. (1998). The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications. London: Praeger. ISBN 0-275-96241-5. 
  85. ^ Bell, Christine (2005). Peace Agreements and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 326. ISBN 0-1992-7096-1. 
  86. ^ US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. World Refugee Survey; Armenia Country Report. 2001.. According to the U.S. State Department, "Approximately 572,000 of the estimated 800,000 ethnic Azeris who fled during the Karabakhi offensives still live as internally displaced persons in Azerbaijan (according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, quoting Azerbaijani Government statistics, June 2008 ), while roughly 4,700 of 360,000 ethnic Armenians who fled Azerbaijan since 1988 remain refugees."[1]
  87. ^ UN General Assembly resolution on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
  88. ^ "Considerable parts of the territory of Azerbaijan are still occupied by Armenian forces, and separatist forces are still in control of the Nagorno-Karabakh region." Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe (PACE), "The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference", Resolution 1416 (2005), Text adopted by the Assembly on 25 January 2005 (2nd Sitting)